They all have a button to see how many trackers they blocked when loading a website. To test it, I visited nypost.com, The New York Post website, which loaded 83 trackers without any anti-tracking tools. DuckDuckGo blocked 15 of nypost.com’s trackers; Brave, 22, and Firefox Focus, 47.
However, the figures do not show the whole picture. On some occasions, Firefox Focus prevented website elements from working properly. On some sites, the videos did not load and the ad windows could not be closed.
Selena Deckelmann, an executive at Mozilla, the company that created Firefox, said that the strict privacy protections in Firefox Focus sometimes caused websites to stop working properly and that the company worked with web publishers so their sites could load. properly.
I didn’t experience major issues when using Brave or DuckDuckGo, although there was a slight hiccup. In one case, when I used DuckDuckGo to navigate Wirecutter, a sister publication of The New York Times that tests and recommends products, the names of some articles did not load completely. Although the site was still functional, it looked weird.
However, in conclusion, you would probably be satisfied using any of the private browsers. Even if you don’t set it as your default browser, it is useful for certain situations, such as a sensitive web search for a disease or condition.
For me, Brave won by a nose. My favorite websites loaded flawlessly and I enjoyed the clean appearance of ad-free sites, all coupled with the flexibility to choose to view ads whenever I chose. Brendan Eich, the CEO of Brave, claimed that the company’s browser blocked cookies “merciless” trackers.
“If everyone used Brave, the tracking advertising economy would end,” he said.